My partner for the OPAC project was Maggie Barrett and we luckily both live in the Boston-area, so we met IN PERSON. Whether in person or on zoom, it's nice to see an actual face rather than just a name on Canva. Maggie walked me through Destiny and I asked my questions as we went. I learned that there are some inconsistencies with patron accounts, limited report functionalities, and books can only be assigned to one genre. I also learned that it's very easy for both staff and students to use. There is great customer service. I was also surprised that Medford High gets their books from Mackin who also upload their MARC records to Destiny for them. I figured that Follett would not allow any interoperability to force people to buy books from them. One question I had was about linking subject headings and after doing some exploring, we realized that the records can't be linked and there is no authority control in that way.
From there, we explored different ILS options until we stumbled upon Koha. We were shocked by how much it can do. Some of the standouts were that it can run SQL reports to provide more options for creating lists. I was personally impressed with how they have patron-side accounts, so students can keep track of their own books. Free and open source is so important to allowing everyone to have equal access to technology. It has its pitfalls, such as usually needing someone with a heavy tech background to manage it. But otherwise, I could see myself choosing Koha over Destiny if that decision ever came about.
The latest issue of American Libraries happened to be about ILS profiles. This was brought to my attention in the discussion broad because despite getting my copy in the mail, I didn't look closely enough at the cover. I read the section about ByWater who owns Koha and would have included that information into the presentation if I'd read it sooner. Adding 37 contracts who are small libraries is quite significant and lends to security that the company will not go bankrupt. I would certainly use that as an argument for implementing Koha in an OPAC proposal.
Reference
Breeding, M. (2025). "2025 Library Systems Report." American Libraries, 56(5), 16-27.

